PRIVATE OFFICER NEWS NETWORK

The latest security-police news

  • Gear Up Today At U.S. Cavalry!
  • AffordBankruptcy.com - Get Started Today!
  • Shop BrickHouseSecurity.com Now!

Archive for May 19th, 2008

Security officer mini training camp www.privateofficer.com

Posted by privateofficernews on May 19, 2008

Security officer training mini camp-authority to arrest www.privateofficer.com

Atlanta Ga. May 19 2008

Security Officer Mini Training Camp



AUTHORITY TO ARREST

As with your scope of Authority, as a private security officer, your Authority To Arrest comes from two independent and separate entities and yet if you have one and not the other, you have no such authority.
Security officers whether working as loss prevention agents, hotel security, mall security patrol officers, college “non-sworn” public safety officers or in any of the other many varied positions in the private security field “Do” have certain Powers Of Arrest but those “powers” are given to the security officer by state statue and by their employers authority.
Before you jump the gun and tell me that security officers can not arrest anyone unless they are deputized or gone through the police academy etc etc, let me explain what powers of arrest exist for private officers.

What is an arrest?
Some think of an arrest as a person being handcuffed and hauled off to jail and fingerprinted and photographed. Is this the true definition of an arrest?
No, it isn’t. An arrest, as defined by the U.S. Supreme Court, is any detention of a person. Once a person is no longer free to move about or leave, “it is an arrest”. Even if you later release that person, the court has ruled that he has been placed under arrest.

Let’s say that you are on patrol at a mall and stop a suspicous person. You and several other security officers block his movement, question him and take him to the security office to fill out a report. Is he under arrest? YES! Once the person no longer has the freedom to move or leave, it is a legal arrest!
On one side of the coin, the law allows you to detain a person that you reasonably suspect has committed a crime but on the other side of that same coin you make an arrest everytime that you stop someone and don’t allow that person to leave freely.
The key to this is that “reasonably” believe that person has committed a crime. As a private officer, you do not have what courts call “probable cause” which is what officers need to stop or detain someone. But the courts have recognized the standard of “reasonable belief” which really equates to the same thing.
If you do not have reason to believe a crime has been committed and you do stop and hold a person, even if it is a hold without handcuffs, you are arresting that person and here is where a private person and even law enforcement face liability and risk of lawsuits from false arrest.
If you have reason to believe that person shoplifted, robbed someone, committed a burglary, drug offense or other crime, YES, you can detain and arrest at that point.

There about a dozen states who offer some form of “Special Police” status to private security officers. Some of those include; Texas, California, Virginia, Washington DC, Ohio, South Carolina, Massachusetts, Maryland, North Carolina, Kentucky and there are a few others.
These “Special Police” designations come with varied amounts of required training and just like with police officer state training requirements, they will vary from state to state. This actually is very frustrating even in law enforcement. State A may require the full time police officer to attend the police academy for 600 hours while in State B only 480 hours are required.
The same holds true for private security training requirements. Some states require 16 hours for unarmed and 40 hours for an armed officer while others require just a few hours at best and more than a dozen states still require no training or certification to be employed as a security officer.

All of the states that issue the “SPO” designations require some form of training in laws of arrest, search and seizure, weapons and tactical defense training and criminal law training.
In some states including Virginia, armed security officers who pass this training are recognized by state statue as “officers” and they can make arrests and transport their prisoner themselves to the nearest magistrate without ever calling in the local police department for assistance. Although not recommended by N.A.P.O., it is perfectly legal to do.
Virginia allows armed security officers who have gone through the minimal required training to issue citations and act as “special police”. This is also true in Washington DC and Maryland. All private officers who have “SPO” designations and have been issued ID cards act as a police department within their coverage area. This authority is statutory. SPO’s do not have that authority on city streets away from their company property.

In North Carolina and Kentucky, security officers can be sworn in as “Company Police Officers after going through the required training. In North Carolina that training includes basic law enforcement training (BLET) of approx 500 hours. This BLET certification is the same training required of any law enforcement officer in the state.
Once the private officer completes that training, he or she can be sworn in by their employer if they are a “Company Police Department” as a sworn police officer. Officers may make arrests, issue tickets and citations and perform all duties of a regular police officer but only on the property of their employer or where assigned as a contract security officer unless they are in “hot pursuit” of a suspect.
Many shopping malls, colleges and hospitals in the state have formed their own police force using the Company Police statues.
Having this authority to make arrests is very productive and often essential for the in house security department. By having this authority, officers do not have to wait for the “real” police to come in and decide who goes to jail. That decision can be made immediately by the SPO on scene and the arrest can be made without delay.

If your state does not have the statutory SPO, you still can have the authority of arrest. This authority comes in the form as a “citizen’s arrest” and can be just as valid as if you were a “sworn”officer.
There are a couple of states that only allow detention and not citizen arrests so be sure to know the difference.
Most states allow these citizen arrests to be made for any misdemeanor or felony committed in front of you or in some cases that you have reason to suspect have been committed by the person that you are arresting.
In this scenario, once you have placed someone in custody, it is very important to notify your local police to respond to the scene. Once the officer arrives, inform them of the circumstances and the reason that you feel an arrest is necessary.
The police officer will then take custody of your arrestee and transport them to the local jail. It will be necessary for you to file an affidavit and in some cases sign an arrest warrant for the person at your local magistrate’s office.

Even if citizen arrests are not allowed in your state, you can detain the person for the police as long as you use reasonable force and do so in a professional manner.

Because all of these forms of “Authority or Power to Arrest” come from the two areas discussed earlier, state statue and your employer, it is extremely important that you have both the legal right and the authorization to arrest from your employer.
Making arrests comes with a lot of responsibility and liability whether acting as a “SPO” or a private officer making a citizen arrest. It should never be taken lightly and should always be done as an informed, trained professional. Don’t go wild and be crazy and overstep your authority.

As a rookie I learned many years ago, an arrest is not always necessary and even when it is, sometimes there’s no rush. If you don’t have back up assistance and things look out of control or possibly dangerous, forgo the arrest until either assistance gets there or file an arrest warrant for the person and go get him or her when you can bring the troops with you!
Making arrests can be dangerous, unpredictable and incite extreme emotions from the person being arrested.
Always use caution and be prepared for the worse when you are moving in to make the arrest.
Once you have made an arrest or detained someone, we recommend that you do not hold the person longer than one hour without having the police on the scene. In the event that the police has not arrived at that point, request them to expedite their dispatch and explain your reason for needing them immediately.
The longer that you hold a person without police presence, the more liability that you face. Liability and risk of a lawsuit for false arrest. If you have good identification from the person, release them and obtain an arrest warrant later unless the charge is of a serious nature such as murder, robbery, rape, burglary and so on.

In the private security field, hundreds and possibly thousands of arrests are made everyday by private security officers. The largest amount of those arrests comes from loss prevention officers making shoplifting arrests. Trespassing arrests are a close second and drug and alcohol violations are third on the list of arrests made by private security officers.

Search And Seizure

Here again, your authority comes form the same two places as your authority to arrest. Your employer and the state statues.

Let’s start with when a “sworn” police officer can search and then we’ll explain your rights to search.

Police officers have the legal right to search under these conditions:

Incident To Arrest- What that means is that once a police officer has made an arrest, they can search your person for weapons and narcotics and other illegal items.
If you were in a vehicle at the time of the arrest, the officer can search the immediate area where you were sitting without a search warrant. For instance, you were the driver so he can search under the front seat on your side, the middle console, glovebox, driver door pockets and that immediate area where you can reach.

Probable Cause- An officer stops you for a moving violation and smells marijuana coming form your vehicle. This gives him “probable cause” to look for illegal drugs.

Plain View
While investigating a loud noise complaint at your apartment or house, the officer spots drugs or other illegal items on your coffee table in his plain view. He can legally arrest and make a limited search of that area for other illegal drugs. To conduct a further search of the remaining premises, he needs your consent or a search warrant.

Consent To Search An officer may request permission from the driver of the vehicle, owner of the house or business for consent to search. Many times during traffic stops, officers will request permission to search a vehicle when they have “no probable cause”.

Search Warrant Police can submit an affidavit to the court based on their investigation, witness statements and other evidence and obtain a search warrant for your premises. This allows them to search for specific items such as stolen merchandise, narcotics, guns etc.


PRIVATE OFFICER SEARCHES

Okay, as a private security officer, here is your authority to search as allowed by law:

1- When Notice Is Given

“Reasonable” searches can be conducted of a person’s vehicle or property while they are on “private property” and notice has been given.

For instance, all vehicles parked on school grounds, both students and staff are subject to reasonable search for drugs. Notice is given as a term of their employment or admittance to attend school. The same holds true for lockers and any other property owned by the school.

Companies who either post notice at the entrance or notify employees at the time of hire, may “reasonably” search their belongings as they exit the property to insure they are not trying to leave with company property.

Examples 1

Company A makes wrenches, screwdrivers and hammers. To cut down on theft, as employees leave, their lunchbags, purses, briefcases, boxes and packages are subject to search. They may even have to walk through metal detectors.
A “body search” would not be considered “reasonable” and therefore could result in lawsuit and possibly arrest.

Example 2

The company has posted a sign at the entrance of their property that states” all vehicles entering subject to search”. This may be at a nucular plant, school, city or state owned property, park or private company.
By entering the property where the sign has been posted in plain view, you have given “consent” to search and now a reasonable search can be conducted to insure that the driver has no weapons or illegal items in the vehicle.
If the person does not want to comply, he can simply choose not to enter the property.
This is often used at housing complexes to stop the flow of narcotics and guns from entering the property.

As an agent of the property, you would be authorized to conduct those searches in a manner that the law allows and your employer mandates.

PAT DOWN OR SEARCH
The United States Supreme Court recognized the need for police officers to conduct “pat-downs” of suspicious persons that they encounter during a traffic stop, investigation or while on patrol. These “pat-downs” are allowed for officer safety to determine if the person is armed. Should the officer find illegal narcotics during the pat-down, the court has ruled that it is legal to make an arrest.

These “pat downs” are not to be conducted on everyone that the officer comes into contact with but whenever a situation poses a threat or is of suspicious nature.

A “limited” amount of spill over authority has been allowed to be used by private security officers. As long as the officer is “reasonable” in their pat downs and doesn’t abuse or overstep that process, there should be no legal ramifications.

Reasonable Pat Downs:

You have found a trespasser on your property and the company is closed and there is suppose to be no one there.

You have detained or arrested a person who has committed a crime.

While patrolling an apartment complex at 3am you find a person who has no ID and you do not believe that he belongs there.

As with making an arrest or detention, searches and pat downs are dangerous especially if you are alone. Use caution and be alert.
If you feel in danger, Don’t Do It! Wait until back up arrives.
We will be talking more about officer safety in another segment of the training.

If you are a designated special police officer and operate under a sworn or commissioned status, your searches are covered the same as any law enforcement officer.

If you are not a sworn officer and acting as a private officer, you have search authority as outlined in When Notice Is Given and reasonable pat downs. You do not have authority to search a person, vehicle or property outside of those areas.

If you have questions, comments or suggestions please email me at rick@privateofficer.com.

Posted in security | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Ga. jailor arrested for having child porn www.privateofficer.com

Posted by privateofficernews on May 19, 2008

Ga.jailer arrested for having child porn www.privateofficer.com

GAINESVILLE, Ga. May 19 2008
By: Bryan Hill
Ntl. Assoc. Private Officers
www.privateofficer.com A Hall County jailer has been fired after being arrested in a child pornography investigation.
Authorities say 32-year-old Blake E. Farr worked at the jail for four years.
Police say that he was arrested Friday and charged with possession of child pornography after an investigation started by the Georgia Bureau of Investigation Task Force for Internet crimes involving children.
The sheriff’s office says it joined in the investigation, and a search warrant was issued for Farr’s home. During the search, investigators seized a computer and other personal items.
Invesitgators say that Farr’s name surfaced while they were conducting an investigation relating to another case.
Police did not release further details about the arrest and the amount of bond for Farr was not disclosed.
Email us/adminassist@privateofficer.com

Join us/myspace.com/privateofficernews

Be part of our social community! www.privateofficer.com

Posted in police | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Shoplifting gang nabbed in Arizona www.privateofficer.com

Posted by privateofficernews on May 19, 2008

Shoplifting gang nabbed in Arizona www.privateofficer.com

Phoenix Az. May 19 2008
By: Bryan Hill
Ntl. Assoc. Private Officers
www.privateofficer.com
Area police and store loss prevention agents have rounded up four professional shoplifters who have been acting as a team in the valley area.
Three women and a 15-year-old child were busted on charges of running this retail theft ring authorities said..
The arrests came as police were investigating gang activity and police conducted a search Thursday of four locations in Phoenix which turned up an estimated $100,000 in stolen clothes, all with the store tags and sensors still on them. The clothing ranged from children’s sizes to adult sizes and included most major brand names.
Detective Frank Mendoza said the clothes were stolen from stores in malls throughout the Valley.
On May 1, he said about $9,100 of stolen merchandize was seized from members of the Sierra family after they spent two hours in eight different stores at Chandler Fashion Mall.
Mendoza said the suspects are to be associated with or active members of the Ninth Street gang in Phoenix. He said they apparently stole and sold the merchandise to support their family.
Three of the suspects were identified as Florinda Sierra, 36; Lorraine Sierra, 41; and Felicia Verduzco, 22. The name of the 15-year-old was not released.
They face charges of felony theft, shoplifting, trafficking in stolen property and operating a criminal syndicate.
The three adults were booked into the county jail and held on an unspecified bond amount.

Email us/adminassist@privateofficer.com

Join us/myspace.com/privateofficernews

Be part of our social community! www.privateofficer.com

Posted in loss prevention, police | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Ga. Tech employee pleads guilty to fraud www.privateofficer.com

Posted by privateofficernews on May 19, 2008

Ga. Tech employee pleads guilty of fraud www.privateofficer.com

Atlanta Ga. May 19 2008

A former Georgia Tech employee pleaded guilty Tuesday to fraud charges arising from using state-issued credit cards to buy 3,800 personal items for more than $316,000.
Donna Renee Gamble, 43, of Marietta, resigned from Tech last August after working as an administrative coordinator at the school’s Parker H. Petit Institute of Bioengineering and Bioscience.
According to federal prosecutors, Gamble used grant money from the National Science Foundation to buy all sorts of items, ranging from foosball tables to lawn tractors.
Gamble entered her guilty plea to 22 counts of mail fraud and theft from an organization receiving federal funds. She is to be sentenced July 22.
“This former Georgia Tech employee has now admitted her blatant and extensive misuse of her government p-card,” U.S. Attorney David Nahmias said in a statement. “Employees with access to government credit cards should understand that the unauthorized use of public funds can lead to a felony conviction and prison.”
As a Tech employee, Gamble had access to the state-issued procurement cards, or “p-cards.” From April 2002 through April 2007, she used her Tech p-cards to buy thousands of personal items, prosecutors said. According to court records, she bought a Waverunner personal watercraft, Coach handbags, an electric scooter, a wide-screen TV, a dishwasher and air conditioning units for her RV.
To conceal the personal nature of certain charges on the cards, she created fake receipts, which she submitted to her supervisor, and made false entries in Tech’s accounting records, prosecutors said.
Gamble’s scheme was uncovered last August when a tipster contacted the Georgia Tech Department of Internal Auditing. Agents then searched her home, looking for all the items she had delivered there.

Email us/adminassist@privateofficer.com

Join us/myspace.com/privateofficernews

Be part of our social community! www.privateofficer.com

Posted in police | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

MGM security want to unionize www.privateofficer.com

Posted by privateofficernews on May 19, 2008

MGM security trys to unionize www.privateofficer.com

from Las Vegas Sun
By Michael Mishak

Las Vegas NV. May 19 2008
A campaign to organize MGM Mirage security guards has turned ugly, with the union’s lead organizer comparing casino executives to terrorists and threatening to bring homeless people and prostitutes to the picket line to make things unpleasant for the company’s customers.
The hardball tactics come as no surprise to anyone who knows the organizer, Steve Maritas. He was convicted in San Diego of stalking his former girlfriend, who he says tricked him into violating a court order to keep his distance. And he says he learned a lot about the union business from his father, a former president of a 30,000-member carpenters district council in New York City who was indicted on racketeering charges.
Maritas’ efforts to organize guards has evoked a bit of a grin among MGM Mirage executives because they think his hard-charging tactics are so over-the-top for Las Vegas that he’ll discredit himself among the very guards he is trying to enlist.
MGM Mirage is telling employees at mandatory meetings that the best relationship between labor and management is a direct one that doesn’t involve a third-party union, and is calling Maritas’ tactics “strikingly offensive.”
Maritas says his tactics, on behalf of the International Union of Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America, are appropriate and that management “only understands one thing: disrupting their business.”
He acknowledges that his self-described street tactics backfired in Las Vegas when he put a picture of Osama bin Laden next to a picture of Mandalay Bay President Bill Hornbuckle on the union’s Web site. “They’re both terrorists,” he told the Sun. Maritas also highlighted MGM Mirage’s partnership with Dubai World, the Persian Gulf holding company — and linked it to the war in Iraq, complete with a counter of American war dead. “It was no disrespect,” he said.
“The whole point is that Americans are dying in Iraq for our freedom and (MGM Mirage) won’t let our guys have their freedom to join a union.”
Security guards, some of whom served in the military, were outraged and told Maritas to take the pictures down and apologize, which he did.
“Maybe it was a low move,” Maritas said. “But that’s the way (labor) war is … I’m from the street. If I have to get down and dirty, I’ll do it.”
He contended that the guards’ initial disgust triggered solidarity among the bargaining unit and that employees have begun taking ownership of the organizing effort.
Maritas says his tactics are born out of frustration. Although he’s been collecting union cards at casinos up and down the Strip, his flagship campaign against MGM Mirage has stalled.
Days before a union election at the Luxor last month, the union filed an unfair labor practice charge with the National Labor Relations Board, alleging management had threatened to withhold scheduled pay raises and other benefits if workers vote for the union. The election at the property is on hold while the federal labor board investigates the charge.
Then, when the union filed for an election at Mandalay Bay, MGM Mirage challenged the size of the bargaining unit, seeking to exclude a quarter of the union’s 300 targeted security officers. The labor board has yet to make a decision or set an election date.
“Getting the cards is the easy part. But you file for an election and look at what happens,” Maritas said. “You can’t beat them at their own game. You can’t take them on head to head. The only way you can take them on is in the street.”
The union has dubbed security guards at Mandalay Bay the “300 Spartans” (the sacrificial army in Greek history) and plans a massive protest outside the property and other MGM Mirage casinos Memorial Day weekend — complete with a busload of homeless people, “the smellier the better,” Maritas said. “Ten dollars a head. I’ve done it on many occasions.” He said he may deliver prostitutes to the scene, too.
Maritas’ efforts to hold organizing elections goes against the grain of unions such as the Service Employees International Union and Unite Here, which work outside the federal election system. Instead, they make certain concessions to management in exchange for its neutrality so they can organize through less contentious card checks.
And labor experts say the security guards union in Las Vegas, by paying people to picket, risk sending a message of weak support to MGM Mirage and the public.
None of this concerns Maritas, though.
“They threw me in the corner. Now I got 300 guys I have to protect,” he said. “We’re strong. We’re going after them. We’re going to do whatever it takes.”
He said he learned those tactics in part from his father, Theodore Maritas, who headed the New York District Council of Carpenters.
Theodore, along with a cadre of mobsters, was indicted in 1981 on racketeering charges. He reportedly disobeyed mob orders and refused to plead guilty. The trial ended in a hung jury, but before Theodore could be retried, he disappeared.
“He was never convicted of anything,” Maritas said. “I can’t change my past, who I am and what I was born into. I’m proud of who I am, what my father stood for, and I’ll defend that until the day I die.”

Email us/adminassist@privateofficer.com

Join us/myspace.com/privateofficernews

Be part of our social community! www.privateofficer.com

Posted in security | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Security officer injured during parking incident www.privateofficer.com

Posted by privateofficernews on May 19, 2008

Security officer assaulted during parking incident www.privateofficer.com

Boulder Co. May 19 2008
A man who was charged with felony menacing in a double Tasering incident over the weekend said he only fired at a private security guard after the guard pointed a stun gun at his mother’s face.
Harvey Epstein, co-owner of Mamacitas restaurant on The Hill, was arrested Saturday night after he got into an altercation with two officers from Colorado Security Services, one of whom had booted a company vehicle for being illegally parked in the alley behind his Mexican restaurant.
Epstein said the van was on his property and should never have been booted. When he tried to cut the device off with bolt cutters after the guard refused to remove it, the situation escalated.
“(The guard) pointed a stun gun at my mother’s face and I immediately responded with my personal Taser,” Epstein said Sunday evening, within an hour of being released from Boulder County Jail. “And we shot each other at the same moment.”
Epstein, 36, said one of the guards jumped on his back after the Taser duel and pressed the barrel of his pistol against the back of Epstein’s head.
When Boulder Police arrived, they arrested Epstein and charged him with felony menacing and use of a stun gun during commission of a crime.
He was released on a $2,000 bond and is scheduled to appear in court June 6.
Epstein said he owns a Taser because he handles “large amounts of cash” and closes the restaurant “well past midnight,” often escorting employees to their cars.
Exactly what happened behind Mamacitas at 7 p.m. Saturday depends on who’s doing the talking.
According to a police report of the incident, Colorado Security Services employee Robert Streiff, who manages parking issues for several businesses along 13th Street, told police he affixed a boot to the restaurant van because it was blocking a trash bin and was sticking out into the alley.
Streiff said upon discovering the immobilized vehicle, Epstein told him he was going to “kick his ass” and held a pair of bolt cutters over his head in a threatening manner. Streiff called for his supervisor, Casey Dane.
Dane told police he reached for his Taser after Epstein refused to drop the bolt cutters. That, according to Dane, is when Epstein pulled a stun gun out of his pocket and shot him.
He fired back, stunning Epstein in return.
Dane told police he only pointed his Taser at Epstein’s mother, Carmen Epstein, after she picked up her son’s stun gun, which still had its probes buried in his skin.
Another witness having a smoke in the alley told police he saw Epstein holding the cutters in a “menacing” way and refusing to drop them when the guards ordered him to.
Carmen Epstein, and Mamacitas employee William High, insisted to police that both guards pointed their pistols at them.
Dane and Streiff said they never took out their guns.
Boulder police Sgt. Pat Wyton said Sunday that Dane acted properly because he felt that Epstein might try to hit him in the head with the bolt cutters.
“The security guard was in the right — he felt threatened,” Wyton said Sunday.
Streiff, who was reached at Colorado Security Services’ offices in Boulder Sunday night, declined to comment.

Email us/adminassist@privateofficer.com

Join us/myspace.com/privateofficernews

Be part of our social community! www.privateofficer.com

Posted in security | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Shoplifters charged with armed robbery www.privateofficer.com

Posted by privateofficernews on May 19, 2008

Shoplifters charged with armed robbery www.privateofficer.com

Cinnaminson NJ. May 19 2008

Police arrested two suspects in Cinnaminson Friday night after a shoplifting incident turned into a strong armed robbery, according to officials

Officers were called out to the Wal-Mart on Route 130 after receiving reports of a fight in the store’s parking lot.

Lisa M. Kain, 34, of Philadelphia, stole $112.50 worth of infant formula from the store and attacked Wal-Mart employees in the parking lot after they confronted her, authorities said.
Tracy T. Groce, 41, of Philadelphia, was waiting in the car for Kain with a 20-month-old infant and fled from the store when police arrived.
Police were able to quickly track down Groce’s vehicle.
Groce was arrested on outstanding warrants and a background check revealed he had been banned from the Franklin Mills Wal-Mart for shoplifting.
Groce was additionally charged with trespassing.
The infant was returned to Groce’s mother.

Email us/adminassist@privateofficer.com

Join us/myspace.com/privateofficernews

Be part of our social community! www.privateofficer.com

Posted in loss prevention, police | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Police search for missing girl and baby www.privateofficer.com

Posted by privateofficernews on May 19, 2008

Police search for 13 yr old and baby www.privateofficer.com

BEECHGROVE, Tenn. May 19 2008 On Monday, the Coffee County Sheriff’s Department issued an endangered child alert for 13-year-old Brianna Nicole Jones and her two-month-old son, Michael Adian Wayne Jones.
Brianna’s mother said her daughter left their home without permission around 11:30 p.m. Sunday.
According to Brianna’s mother, the 13-year-old took her two-month-old son with her.
It is believed that Brianna is enroute to Florida, possibly to the baby’s father’s home. Michael’s father is believed to be Matthew Fults.
Brianna was last seen wearing a black shirt with a gray tribal design on the right shoulder (like in the picture) and blue jeans.
If you have any information please call local law enforcement.
Email us/adminassist@privateofficer.com

Join us/myspace.com/privateofficernews

Be part of our social community! www.privateofficer.com

Posted in police | Leave a Comment »

Security officer dies from injuries www.privateofficer.com

Posted by privateofficernews on May 19, 2008

Security officer dies from assault injuries www.privateofficer.com

SOUTH BEND Ind. May 19 2008 A 63-year-old security guard died late Saturday evening from severe trauma to the head after a patron at the South Bank Lounge attacked him early Saturday, police said.
James E. Muddiman Sr. was trying to get people to leave the bar at 3 a.m. when 27-year-old Joshua Kati assaulted him, police said.
“When I was in the parking lot I was sitting there, everybody started yelling, screaming, a bunch of people started running around and it was chaotic,” explained Bill Townsend, who was outside the South Bank Lounge when the attack occurred. “I couldn’t believe something like that happened when I found out later on what it really was.”
Muddiman was treated at Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center, where he later died.
Kati, a South Bend resident, was initially arrested on suspicion of aggravated battery and battery resulting in serious bodily injury. Police say that these charges will be updated to murder in the second degree.
The incident took place in the 1700 block of Lincoln Way East.

Email us/adminassist@privateofficer.com

Join us/myspace.com/privateofficernews

Be part of our social community! www.privateofficer.com

Posted in police, security | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »